Expressions.

Humans are of many expressions, in different ways emanating from GOD and in some ways from 'the Kingdom', as in Earth, or 'the Lives that we live', also me as in 'little me'. These two - GOD and Earth (Creation) being 'the same', as in coming from the same 'root'. They are also not the same, as 'God' is the teacher, and human the 'disciple'.

This relation, even as little authoritarian as is possible, authoritarian it still is. This must be so, at least as long as we wish to learn from anything but our own mistakes, that which  is 'trial and error'.

Trial and error is a system that no one can beat. This as it adds no restrictions at all, on the 'pupil'. The 'pupil' is his own teacher. Is he? What is the pupil learning from, and what is 'heshe' learning to adapt to?

In this world called 'Earth', there are multitudes of expressions that are not 'human'. Land, water, trees, the grass that cows eat. Interacting with 'expressions' of Creation such as these; is this 'trial and error'? Is there a 'system' to 'trial and error'? Clearly, if one prefer to see Creation as 'GOD', then 'he she it' that is GOD, is placing the 'trial and error' inside a 'framework'; 'Earth'.

If this is so - which it is - then 'trial and error' is 
'structured', placed there, and part of our school 
'of learning', too? Yes, this is so, at times.

Our lives are learning experiences, placed within 
a pretty wide 'setting', the 'school' and 'playground' 
that we call 'Earth'.

...

This was the environment human was placed into, in that which we call 'the stone age'. Stone age was pretty much 'trial and error'. Learning took time. Trial and error takes time. It is time consuming.

Humans in those days understood that it was, in many ways, better to become groups. Dangerous animals, fear of the dark unknown, fear of aggressive tribes. Many were the reasons to become members of 'groups' and, within those groups, members of 'teams'. 

And so, am I suggesting that the 'fear' placed 
inside human, is a 'tool of learning'?

Yes, this is exactly what it is. And the only justification there can be, for inducing 'fear' it is, too. Fear diminishes, makes 'expression' 'bleak'. Fear makes the blossoming of gradually more vivid expressions of human and other animals pretty near impossible. Fear in this way kills much of that which is 'life'. This as 'life' is more than 'food and lodging'. 

...

The Bible has it, human life on Earth started with two beings living inside a place of peace, called 'Eden'. That same book tells us, that one of  their children, killed his brother. This killing was made from a place of anger, maybe also jealousy. And Kain was forgiven, by his father Adam. 

In the early ages, life was dangerous. Human had to keep together to survive. And so human did, and enjoyed it, too. Human discovered that 'heshe' is a 'social animal'. Human understood, that 'we' belong together. Why does the Bible place those first two human beings inside a 'garden of peace'? How could the one writing the Bible know, that this was an important quality, for 'early human being', to survive?

...

Humans have instincts, drives, and reasoning. We are also of intuition, empathy and emotions. Animals, of which we are one, have instincts and drives. Humans have by now learned, that also other animals than us have reasoning. 

Intuition, empathy and emotion are qualities placed into the third and fourth chakra. Love is placed in the second. Yes, love as in 'the force'. The heart chakra is of 'love' too? Yes, the heart chakra - what we call the 4th or 'green' chakra - is of love. That chakra in finer sense than what does the third, mediates and add nuance, flavour, to the 'force' emanating from from the 2nd chakra. 

And what about that 'other group' of 'non sense' 
maneuvre capabilities? God asks. Allow me to introduce 
to You, the term 'basal force of emotion'.

These human (as in me and You) and animal 'drives', these are all placed in the 1st (base, red) chakra? No, they are not. This chakra is of that 'basal force'. Did I tell You that? No, I did not. Well, I just did so. Sexuality, hunger, thirst, the 'basal force' of emotion. All of these 'drives' are placed 'where we start our journey'; at the human first chakra. These are modified at the second, sacral, chakra, as are all other aspects of that 'basal emotional force'.

...

The 'basal force of emotion'? Yes, Lars, that force emanate from our base. This force is a kind of energetic 'flow'. As are all 'drives', flowing from the sakral base and further up the 'ladder' to the heavens, that is the human 'energetic and physical body'. And may we put a name to that 'basal force of emotion'? Yes, I will give You a suggestion, God says to Lars, his stubborn pupil. 

'Love' is the name of that force. 'Life'
is another name. 'Love' and 'life'
are, 'at origin', the same 'thing'.
  
...

This 'love'  flow 'through' our 'base', is that sexuality? Is it the mothers love for her child? Or are these expressions 'merely' instincts? And what is an instinct?

Instincts are placed at the base, first chakra. Sexuality, 
to an extent, is instinct. Hunger and thirst too. 

When 'filtered' through our beings, love gets different expressions. In the second chakra, it is more of a 'force'. Human will learn to in different ways use this 'force', that emanate from the second chakra. The second chakra is of the 'tribe', remember? And human learned to understand the strength of becoming part of 'hisher' family and tribe.

But the second chakra(s) 'teach' us more than that. When focusing 'mind energy' to that chakra, one may learn to 'heal'. The 'force' that is the 'love' of the second chakra, can not bring the dead back to life, but it can 'heal' illness. Human will learn how to use 'love energy' to heal, and that learning is already starting.

...

When 'love' flows through the third chakra, it is filtered through that which is 'me', my own being. This is where we have our 'gut feeling'. And what is the 'love' of our guts? The third chakra is our emotional sense. Love as 'emotion',  'infatuation', 'agape'. The kind of love that make us wish to 'linger' and 'unite'. 

Love of the third chakra wish to 'give and receive'. To 'love and be loved', 'be admired', 'give presents', 'fly high in the sky', 'allow others to shine, too'. These are all 'emotional expressions' of love.  

Give and recieve. Love demands, and gives, everything. Yes, love does just that. And so it has to be 'fine tuned', sometimes 'dampened', possible to handle.  

...

Love in the fourth chakra is 'feeling'. Humans sometimes 'feel' good together, or 'bad' together. Love and fear are two sides of the same coin? No, they are two different flows of energy, both originating from the first chakra. Fear is a much weaker drive, that what is love. Still, when 'fear' is, the ability to love will be very much less.

'Fear' is a 'modifier' of love. It reduces the ability to love. Other 'modifiers' of love are placed in the third, fourth and fifth chakras. 'Fear' is of the second chakra, and in this differ from 'love', which is pure life energy, flowing inside human at hisher 'base' chakra.

The chakras, which 'I' - God - have chosen to present as 7 'energetic centres', are in truth quite many. There are several hundreds and thousands of 'nodes' modifying the drives and 'basal forces'.

The 'picture' of the energetic body being of 7 'centres' is still valid. There are 7 'big' nodes inside human of 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th densities. Here below is a 'scheme' of these 7 'centres'. 

...

In the center of the image, there are 7 'chakras'. The muladhara 
chakra is at 'base', and pictured red. As energy flows through the 
male (pingala), female (ida) and middle (sushumna) paths, it gets 
further expression. The male/female 'channels' are not 'nervous', 
but purely energetic. The 'middle path' - sushumna - is both 
nervous and energetic.The energy flow is of one basic kind. 
Life energy. This energy, that give human life, is a low 
emitting flow. It is not light as in vibration, but light 
as in 'flow'.  Human will discover, that at zero point, 
there is still 'energy'. This energy is 'life', the source 
of everything. This is the energy flowing through 
the human body, and that give human
much of hishers 'expression'. 

...

What is a human being?

Humans kill themselves and other beings. Mammals, fish or bird, we kill them all. 'Humane' is a word rarely used to denote behaviour that inflicts pain. Humans also do not enjoy causing pain. We see such behaviour as 'abnormal', outside of the norm. Yes, outside of the norm of what is to be 'humane'. And still we kill. Reasons for killing others are fear, survival, anger. 

Killing inflicts pain.

And so, until not a murderer, a 'killing being', human is not a 'humane being'. When is 'human being' to become a 'humane being'? If human is an animal, and animals quite often 'humane', could one then say that these animals are 'humane beings'? Yes, suggested is, one could.

The 'human being' will become a 'humane being', when stopping 'hishers' murdering of themselves and of other beings. The human is to stop killing himself in 3rd density. Will human by then already, by 'us' be seen as humane? Are cows, sheep, goats, and other beings already 'humane beings' in higher densities seen as the 'equals' of human?

...

This is 'old God' again, Your Creator. Yes, 'Lars', I will clarify.
Humane beings may be of many forms, living in as 'different places' as possible. Human is living on Earth, and walking Earth, too. Human, as of this 3rd density, does still not fly. Neither does he live as a mammal, a fish, or turtle, in the Sea. Clearly, we do have other beings living with us right now, on this Earth, that are humane beings.

Among the 'qualities' of the human of third density is to be of 'no killing of ones own species'. This is a 'core quality', as killing does - among mammals more than most other creatures on this Earth - inflict pain (physical, or grief). 

Human of second 'derivative' (as in not fully integrated) is 'allowed' to kill other humans. This 'permit' in fact is so strong, God suggest that 'forced to' is a more proper word. In Christianity, Petrus has a vision where a tablecloth filled with animals is given to him from the heavens. A voice is telling him that he is allowed to eat of all that is on this cloth. And so most Christians do eat of all that meat. In Islam, the meat of the pig is seen as 'unclean'. And so, the pig is 'saved' from slaughter, for muslims. In India, the cow is sacred, and so in similar way in hindu country saved from being killed.

...

The one reason for 'me' making human kill himself is, this will more thoroughly than anything else does, engrave 'non violence' into the human being and genome. Are there other reasons for 'me' making humans kill? No, there is not. Human will become 'fearful', when being murdered. 'Fear' also make humans kill. And so, that 'fear' that prevent human from developing more profound expressions, will in fact also be a help for human to becoming of 'non violence'.

When a human is forced to kill other beings that 'heshe' likes and gets 'help' from. Beings such as the cow, dog, horse or goat, then there will be felt 'reluctance'? Yes, most often it will. Humans are feeling animals, and do not enjoy killing other animals that feel. The slaughter of a cow does demonstrate that the cow is in 'fear', 'pain'.

And so, there grows a 'reluctance', a 'disgust' and a 'hate' of 'killing', inside human. This feeling of 'no more killing' get stronger, as more and more humans have 'non killing' engraved into their RNA, and genome. RNA work in that way. 'Engraving' of RNA takes place every time a strong reaction is felt.

...

Why, then, do I wish for human to himself do this 'engraving' of non violence into himself? Why don't I just create human 'of non violence'? 

The sole reason for this is 'expression'. 'Expression' is the sole reason for Creation. Love gets more nuances and beauty gets more 'beautiful'. All our drives and that basic 'force' of life when 'filtered' higher and higher 'up' into our energetic being, will get more and more nuances, shades, variety. 

'Expression', physical and energetic, is life.

If human is to become a 'feeling being', rather than an 'alive, but still dead' one, then we have to walk this 'ladder' up through our chakras. And that ladder is of very much 'pain'. This is the reason for 'me' as in 'God', to make human 
fearful, to make human kill.

Yes, it is.

And as I do not 'know' all expressions, as I do still not know all those kinds of 'beauty', that human can take on, I will have to make human develop this way. By 'doing it himself', in that doing quite often 'hating' me. Why, God, did You have to kill my son? Why, God, did You force us to eat those that we see as our friends?

GOD is life. I am LOVE. Who says that 'I' - as in 'me', 'us', 'You' - do not feel that pain, too? It is 'me' who is You. It is 'me' who gets murdered and slaughtered.

... 

Our different cultures in these days 'popularize' different animals. Walt Disney has made wonderful movies, pointing out that animals may be more 'humane', than human was allowed to understand. Yes, was allowed to understand, by God. Disney World today have shows with dolphins and killer whales, too. Film producers show us movies of 'dreamlike' or 'fantasy' content. 

And these movies become seen by many humans. And in these movies, more often than not, beings other than 'human beings' add context and flavour to that which we 'long to see'. That which is of 'fantasies and fairies and talking dragons'. That which is of 'human beings friends' helping us to save 'our world'.

We witness, in movies and in 'different realities' and settings, the humane qualities of beings other than ourselves. Why do we use the expression 'the memory of an elephant' (or horse, as that animal has a very good memory, too)? The turtle has incredible memories, from hishers swimming around the seas for more than 100 years.

Dolphins develop similar strategies as we do, to survive, to 'dominate', to live in 'less fear'. And so they work in 'teams'. They join each other, like also the human understood was of good, to protect each other and survive. And they develop strategies to do that, too. So, at times they work in teams? Yes, they do.

They like to 'chat' too. Just like the whale, and many  primates do. As a mammal develops, it will get more 'expression'. This 'expression' is in part common, in part 'marks' of its' own species. 'Marks' of belonging to that 
group of mammals. 

Now, if 'Shamu' and his cousin dolphin were allowed to live in freedom, 'swimming and playing' their world, would they not prefer to do so? 

How big a pool is required, for a killer whale or dolphin to enjoy the interaction with hisher human friends, more than what heshe does, 'walking' the seas? There is a pretty neat way of checking. Just open the 'doors' to those pools, and allow them to choose themselves. 

...

Sadly, going back to us humans, opening all doors may not be 'the solution'. If we were to open the doors to our schools, there would be pretty many empty seats in many class rooms. And as bad as our educational systems are, they are still in some ways more effective, than 'trial and error'. And more efficient, too.

'Efficiency' is a word of 'finer tuning'. As is 'wisdom' of 'finer tuning' than what is 'intelligence'. Intelligence, using a much broader definition than what is used today, is 'raw'. It is there, before wisdom is there (as in inside our beings). Wisdom is 'intelligence' and 'balance'. 

Wisdom is 'intelligence' modified by 'life', by many lives.

'Wisdom' using the 'chakra frame', is 'modified', when the 'basal force of life' filters through our chakras. This 'force of life' ignite our 'drives', and after that help us develop 'feeling' and 'emotion'. Intelligence paired with the 'non violence' induced by 'fear', coupled with 'feeling' and 'emotional' qualities, is that what is 'wisdom'?

No, not in its' entirety. Wisdom is built as an interaction between 'clear light', that basal force of 'intelligence' filtering through our beings, from upside and down. The human 'crown chakra' - the 7th we call it, too - is where the inflow of 'clear light' is. This 'clear light' in similar way flows and 'filters' down through our energy body, as does the 'basal force of life' flow through our 'base' (the kingdom), then 'filtering' up through the sacral chakra and 'higher'.

... 

The 'throat' chakra is the chakra that make human talk and listen. Yes, lets express it that way. The throat (fifth) chakra also tell us not to listen, when 'morons' try to force 'bad food' and 'bad wisdom' into our system. There are 'modifiers' inside all our chakras, the 5th one too.

What makes us not wish to have 'morons' stuff ourselves full of 'crap', is a combined reaction in the physical body (our genome), and energetic bodies (chakras, and much more). As the human being spend longer time on Earth, he develops into a more and more 'finely tuned', menthally, emotionally and by reason shaped, being. 

Pink Floyd's 'the Wall' talks of that forcing down the throat. Alternative learning of today, the Waldorf system and the anthroposophical school of Rudolf Steiner. These and other 'Religiosophies' (*) point out to us, that the human is, in himherself of 'oneness'. We learn more, when listening to music. We get more apt at learning, when mixing physical and theoretic practices and disciplines.

(*) 'Religiosophy', a new word for a new world, built using words 'religion' and 'philosophy'. 
'Religiosophy' means to 'reconnect to wisdom, law'. The word 'philosophy' is taken from 
the Greek word "φιλεω" (phileo) meaning "to love" or "to befriend" and "σοφια" (sophia) 
meaning wisdom. Philosophy is "the love of wisdom". The prefix re (again) + ligare 
(bind, connect); religare "to reconnect". The Sanskrit word dharma, sometimes 
translated as "religion", also means law.(source: wiki)

...

And what about a Mozart and Einstein? What about Stephen Hawking or Madonna? Would they be better off, when asked to mix their interest in the 'rhytmic tonalities found in music, physics, math', with dance or gymnastics? Suggested is, they would be even more happy allowed to dancing what they prefer. Madonna would like to dance, but preferrably 
using her own choreography.

Suggested is, these guys prefer to dance much 'inside their own minds and beings'. Madonna was the 'straight A student' that dropped out of school, prefering to 'sing the music of her mind', to herself and us.

...

Madonna 'American Pie'

This is Madonna singing 'American Pie', Lars. And there is one more voice singing, too. This is not the voice that David, that is Your son, did prefer. He thought it to be 'too dark'. You did not. Yes, You have a 'special liking' for this song. It stirs Your emotion. As does it mine. I made Madonna record this song in 1997, the year when the music that was for me USA, died.

USA had been the engine for my and our world to grow, to grow into a 'new world of peace'. This world had to be made 'cruel', for human to become of 'non violence'.

There has been much music recorded on this 'theme'. I have made You listen to pretty much of it. Please tell me of one musician, that prefers war and pain, before 'ahimsa'. The pain that people sometimes place inside music, is not of 'violence' in itself. It may become violent, though, when the pain inside gets tough.

Madonna was to become a 'star', as in 'icon', of these times. Do I wish for You to keep that sentence here? Yes, I do. For now, I do. Madonna is 'her own person too', carrying her own 'soul concept'. As was George Harrison of the Beatles. John Lennon was 'only me'. I was John Lennon. Elvis was 'only me', too, and so was Michael Jackson. 

Michael is not one of Your favourites, though 'like him' You do. Humans are of 'different taste', they 'differ in expression'. Did these singers/musicians that were 'only me' as in 'God' ever belong to that which is right now the 'real world'? Yes, all of these did. (Not all of the music I have given You, is of that world, but much is.)

Were there more people, that were 'only me'? Yes, there were. Mozart was only me, as was Beethoven. Bach was only me, and Brahms too. That You did not expect, but it was Brahms who made the hungarian melodies that You prefer, remember? 

Impressionistic music is Debussy? Yes, it is. And Degas, and many more. And I were these, too, 'only me'? No, I was not Degas, but I was 'Debussy'. Impressionistic...hmmm...what music is not made from impressions? What music is not 'expression of impression'? In fact pretty little.

When I choose to visit Earth in human form that is 'only me', I do this without a 'soul complex'. There is no 'personal plan' for that human, as that human is nothing but myself, as in 'God'. Sometimes, there need walk humans on this Earth, in different ways so 'differently gifted', they have to be 'just me'.

These beings could 'not possible' exist, without being 'only me'. Looking at the shape that is our DNA and RNA of a certain time, one will sometimes wonder how these could have had the insights they had. And so, some of these were 'only me'. As few as possible. And the reason always the same. 

These were there to help 'us' as in 'us humans' progress, continue walking that ladder of Jacobs', higher and higher. Otis Redding was only me too? No, he was part me, part 'You', as in 'carrying a personal soul (plan)'. The text and melody to that song I did assist to make? Yes, I did, but not more than I always do. ((:

...

Back to 'American Pie'.

USA has been the engine for this world to 'grow', for the last 70 years. Before that, there was Germany, USA, and 'old England'. Before that was 'nothing', as before that was no industry, at all. These were the countries that carried much of the 'bless and burden' of bringing this World through industrialization, world wars, and into the 'global age' inside which we now live.

And so, 'American Pie' is about USA and about being both 'great' - as in generous - and 'narrow minded' - as in not generous enough. This is USA. And no country is generous enough. That is so.

I placed pretty many messages to You and Your brother, when You were growing up. I did the same to Charlott, and to Dani, and to David, too.

This tune is for David. Yes, it is. It is also for You, and USA. This song is not that much for Dani, though she will like it, when reading the lyrics. And the voice of that one singing in the chorus? That voice is me, put there to make You 'remember' David. It was not there before, remember? Yes, You do. 

And what about Dani and her expressions? Well, You have seen the way she paints, haven't You? And there are songs
I wrote to her, too. ((:

...

The day the music died...

That line is 'for David', and 'me' as in 'myself'. I am not here, now. I 'left' some two decades ago, and before that I left some ten thousand years ago. But I am still here? Yes, I am still here, inside of Earth 3rd density. I am inside You and everyone of this Earth, and many more Earths. All of them, in fact.

Now, when did I leave? I 'left' that which was myself, during those ages from 1900 and up unto 1985. This is not entirely true, as there is still some of 'me myself' left, also in 1995, but very very little. I had to 'replenish' myself then. I got help from 'my family', those that were closest. Among these were 'Harry', who is my own Son, and always will be.

'Harry' is the one that has 'maneuvred' this Earth, since 1985. This is so. And he is good at it. He is not good enough. This is what I say. But he will learn. Yes he will. Harry will never be 'me', however. Why? Because that will be You, for a short while, before I 'get back' into myself, some 3500 years into the future. I will by then be replacing You, and it will be Your turn to 'replenish'?

No, it will not be necessary, for quite some time. Some 3500 years from now, this measured in this world real time, these universes will have been 'rolled back together', and founding a 'new' universe. A new being. A new 'GOD' to become. This 'being' will be of similar shape as that which I AM of, but different in one way. 

HE will be You, but You will not be inside him. SHE will be You, too. But You will not be inside her, either. Because You will have to 'vanish' before that. Vanish as in 'not be anything that You are as a human being'. 

Yes, that is exactly the case.

You, Lars, are many 'fragments' of that being which is my 'brother in arms', when I first got here. I choose to confirm that, some 300 years ago, when I placed You inside that body of the 'christ of those times', carrying the name of no one in particular. Many are the lives, lived in very beautiful ways. Most of these lives are remembered by no one but 'me'. And by 'me' as in God, they are rembered 'always'.

This is so.


Let's take it again...

You were created some 10 000 years ago, in part You were. That part lived with me, in my thoughts and inside my reality, for long times? No, You did not. You were created in 1958, this is so. Made by something placed by me 10 000 years ago, or so. The reason for that being 'fusion' of energy? No, not in this world that knowledge is not.

And the 'input' came from else where? Yes, it did. The input came from 'myself', from 'old times'. Yes, this is important, to 'me' and yes, I will 'sometime' tell You pretty much more, and yes, it will 'be served' in 'portions'.

The reason was 'fusion', still. The input came from Your 'Father' (as in 'origin'), him who IS MY BROTHER. Him who I call 'IM'? No, him who I call my Brother. We do not carry names? No, not 'up here' we do not. We are both both 'Im and 'Em'. That You did not know before. 'Up here', we are both of those qualities, both 'Im' and 'Em'? Yes, we are of that quality, both. 

That which differ, is even more 'basic'. In fact not 'polarities' even? What about 'good and evil', then? No, we - me and my only BROTHER - act more like polarities of good, that need evil to survive, to 'develop' (further, create) the 'human being' as good as we can. As You are getting to 'grasp', evil may in some ways help create 'good'.

Gods, and still with sole focus to create a human of more expression. Yes, that is so. In some ways, GOD is not human. That which is GOD, is 'divine' in that 'he-she-it' is the sole force of life. 

GOD AND LIFE IS THE SAME IDENTITY.

And what about 'little God', the 'managing director' of 'big GOD'? That 'little God' is living in many expressions, and levels of Creation'. Just like there are many Universes, and many more humans, and all these humans 'universes to become'. Just like Creation is plentyful and 'plentyfold'. Just like that, God plays his game from different magnitudes.

And little God is 'God', too, or 'God and human'? Me and 
my brother are both GOD. When walking that ladder up Creation (as in different densities or vibration), we will become 'different'. The place where we are asked - yes, asked - if we wish to 'become' GOD, that place is in 8th density? No, it is not. That decision has been taken before that. With You, Lars, You had no choice. 

You are already 'me', as in 'G', but not me as in 'G'. Part of 'G' You are, and the rest will be there, pretty soon. And some more, too. The 'O' and 'D' will be there too, but that will have to wait, for quite some time. You are my one and only 'son' of a certain kind. Yes, indeed You are, and 'me' in pretty much Your entire being, too. 

And You are 'me' to become, too? No, You are not. You are to become me and also in part 'my BROTHER'. That which was placed by my brother, for me to find in 1958 (Your time), was not 'You'. As You are to be 'built' - rebuilt -  'You' will become more and more of 'him', more of that quality. 

And that quality is 'love', with very little but still some, nuance of 'kindness' to it. I will better explain to You, what that 'message' from my Brother was, but that will have to be a little later.

GOD is life. GOD is Creation. God is not human, as he does not any more carry a soul. God is there to help Creation in building human into an even more beautiful being, a being of greater multitudes of expressions. In doing so, we create 'worlds' and universes. In all of these 'worlds', human is 'asked' to carry some 'friends' up that ladder.


WE ARE THE SOURCE OF CREATION.

Why 'we'? Is GOD 'we'?

Yes, GOD is 'we'. 'He-she-it' is also 'me', and everything else. GOD - as in 'we', more than 'me' - is the source of Creation. And that creation is of multitude. This is why 'I' as in GOD use that word, 'we'.

And what about those friends of ours that are of 'no hands'? The dog, the dolphin and the elephant? Yes, friends like these we 'carry with us', too. And they walk up the ladder of Creation with us. And they carry us with them, but later. 

They are Created quite different from 'man', and will for quite long time, carry different expressions (qualitites, gifts) with them, for also man to be helped by, when leaving his physical body and before doing so, too.

And does also the dolphin and the dog, the cat and the weasle, become God? 

Yes, they do!

...and GOD, too.

...and fish become GOD, too?
Yes, they will, if 'we' only find the ways
to make cold blooded beings into enough 'love'.
This is the way it is, right now, as far as
I know. And I know pretty much, as
I am the all.

I AM.

Here now?

YES, I AM HERE NOW.

...


My 'Brother' went 'down', as in 'sacrificed himself in his very most inner self', some 10500 years ago. Hisher 'seed' - as in humans - was born into many, many universes and Earths. That which was 'him', was 'placed inside space/time from 10500 years ago and pretty much until now? Yes, this is how 'we' do it. 

I 'myself' went 'down' starting 345 years ago, measured as 'my time' outside time. I placed myself into 100's of universes. I had to do so, as my own being is 'big', the 'biggest' there is, anywhere. 'Me myself' in my very 
own inner most being, was and is of 800 billion 
humans and souls.

These 800 billion were (no, not 'will' and not 'are') placed, 
as in 'sowing'. 

But I am not 'grain'. 

I AM THE MOST LOVE THERE WAS, 
AND THAT IS NOT GRAIN.

...

...and the reason for me doing so, is LOVE. Love, as in 'expression'. Love, as in 'multitude'. Love, as in 'all of You, that are me', as in 'my little ones'.

**
*

(Yes, I will tell You more of 'Im' and 'Em' too, but later)



(c) copyright until further notice.